2024 isn't over yet, but with 10 months under our belt, it's been an eventful year so far. We'd highlight three particular events that have taken shape recently. One, we're approaching the presidential election, two, the feds started cutting interest rates. And three, the stock market is up sharply for a second year in a row.
Now, none of these are unprecedented, but they are sufficiently infrequent and meaningful to logically prompt investors to ask, what comes next? So let's take a look at each and evaluate prior periods for perspective on how markets have performed following similar instances.
Let's start with the one that's occupying the headlines, the election. As we move past Election Day and the dust settles on the partisan reactions to the Oval Office's latest occupant, we think the market's focus will return to a more lasting influences of the economy, interest rates, and corporate earnings-- otherwise, known as the fundamentals. This is good news because history teaches us time and again that presidents don't govern longer term market performance. The fundamentals do. So as we advance beyond November 5, here are a few perspectives to remember.
Historically, market volatility has risen leading up to elections and then subsided afterwards. We think this demonstrates that once the election uncertainties are replaced by a clearer policy outlook-- and by the way, regardless of which political party is setting those policies, the market typically refocuses on the prevailing conditions. Looking back to World War II, stock market volatility has decreased measurably in the month following presidential elections. Now, more recently, the VIX index, which is a measure of stock market volatility, has faded nearly 40% in the 10 days following the 2020 election.
In terms of performance, stock market has generally done well after elections, so we'd recommend sticking around for this one. Let's start with the short term. Over the past 80 years, in the one month leading up to a presidential election, stock market was positive for that month only slightly more than half of those years-- so basically a coin flip. However, from the election through the end of the year, the market was positive during that period in all but three years.
And I'd point out for those time frames, if we just single out the 10 best post-election performances, five of those followed Republican wins, five followed, Democrat wins. If we widen the view a little bit, as we should as investors and we look at the market over the year following Election Day, stocks were up in nearly 70% of those years, gaining an average of more than 10% But let's take an even broader perspective and look at the market performance over presidential terms. Over that same 80-year period, the stock market has shown an average gain of 61% during four-year presidential terms.
Now of note in something that might actually come as a surprise, the stock market has returned 65% since the beginning of President Biden's term. The return under the 2017 to 2020 term under President Trump was 81%, and it was 72% and 71% during President Obama's two terms. Now, what this demonstrates is that there is consistency of stock market growth regardless of the political party occupying the White House.
Shifting from an event that tends to have a fleeting influence to one that traditionally poses more significant implications for markets, let's take a look at Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. Markets have been fixated on and driven predominantly by the timeline for rate cuts for the better part of the last year. Now that wait is over, with the Fed cutting interest rates in September, kicking off what we anticipate will be an extended period of policy easing. The Fed will likely respond to continued trends of moderating inflation pressures alongside emerging signs of a softening labor market.
Traditionally, the Fed starts cutting rates in response to an economic downturn, a financial shock, or a crisis. The conditions are somewhat unique this time, as the Fed is not seeking to address a collapsing economy or arrest a seizing financial system. Put differently, the Fed often cuts rates to press on the accelerator, stimulating a sputtering economy, which we don't think we're in the middle of at the moment. We think the upcoming rate-cutting cycle is more about letting off the brake upon which the Fed has had its foot firmly pressed for the past two years.
We expect this rate cutting cycle to proceed gradually, and barring a sharp or unexpected change in the path of inflation or unemployment, we think the Fed will make incremental cuts to its policy rate, seeking to further reduce the rate of inflation and also provide some support to the economy. Here's the good news.
Interest rate cuts have historically been favorable for the markets, and we don't think this time is an exception. We'd note that rate cuts have been widely and eagerly anticipated at this stage. A portion of that benefit has already been pulled forward into the stock market, and that's demonstrated by the more than 40% increase that we've seen just since interest rates peaked in October of '23. We don't, however, think the benefits of lower rates have been fully exhausted. As an example, this table shows the broader performance of equities in the one and two years following the commencement of rate cuts.
The 2001 and 2007 experiences, which included influences such as the dotcom bubble burst, 9/11, and the global financial crisis, produced weakness that extended well beyond the start of rate cutting cycles. However, we think history is on investors' side when it comes to post rate cut returns. Even including 2001 and 2007, though, the stock market rose by an average of 6% in the one year following the first rate cut and gained an average of 24% two years after. And when rate cuts weren't accompanied by recession, which we don't anticipate this time either, returns were notably higher.
And finally, with the current bull market celebrating its second birthday last month, let's look at how markets have performed after similar strong periods. As of late October, the S&P 500 was up more than 22%. If it holds on to this gain for the remainder of 2024, this will be the second consecutive year with a return of 20% or more. There's plenty of year left, and by no means is there an assurance that this gain will be upheld. But let's presume for a second that I haven't jinxed it, and let's look back at similar market periods to see what they might tell us about the potential encore to this run.
Since 1950, there have been five previous instances in which the stock market followed a 20% or more annual gain with another 20% year. Two of those came in the early and mid 1950s. The next came in 1975-76, then again in 1982 and '83, followed by the tech bubble phase in the late 1990s.
Outside of those periods, there were an additional 14 years in which the market gained 20% or more, but then failed to repeat that feat the following year. So in total, when the stock market rose by 20% in a single calendar year, the average return in the following year was a healthy 12%, and the average return in the year following two consecutive years of 20% gains was-- wait for it-- also 12%, although that figure is admittedly boosted by the prolific gains that we saw in the late 1990s. So while 20% yearly gains are actually quite common, with nearly 40% of years from 1950 to 2023 having a return above that 20%, back-to-back rallies of that magnitude are actually quite rare, which should add some appreciation to the rally that we've seen in 2023 and 2024.
Now, while there's nothing special about the 20% mark, we view it generally as a mark of a particularly strong annual performance. There have been nine years since 1950, in which the stock market has gained between 15% and 20%, which is also strong returns. The ultimate determinant of 2025 performance will, in our view, be driven largely by the fundamental backdrop, namely economic growth, Fed policy, and the trend in corporate profits.
Now it may be a stretch for the stock market to make a three peat with another 20% gain next year, and we doubt the year ahead will progress without some setbacks. But fundamental conditions do, in our view, make the case for investors to remain broadly optimistic. For more market insights and to consider strategies appropriate for your financial strategy and portfolio, contact your Edward Jones financial advisor.